I have to admit, I'm a little overtaken by the success of facebook. It almost seems like yesterday when I retired my ICQ account, jumped on the MSN bandwagon, and saw the future unfold. I blink a couple times and I'm having to get a gmail account and myspace was cool. BAM, facebook time.
What a great idea! How grand, I can put all my info up on the site provided by such a nice group of people who I will trust. They even so generously provide me with a way of giving them my email account password, so they will tell all my contacts to join too... so I don't have to! WOW.
I mean, why wouldn't anyone trust these people? Sure they've had a few "shady" (and believe me, I'm using that without the slightest bit of defamation), but what giant corporation that represents people over profit doesn't have a few moments of "did they just seriously...?". Sure they're no Apple Inc, but give em a bit and I'm sure they'll push a head.
Okay, so I'm a tad bit on the sarcastic side, and can you blame me? Seems most people don't care. Apathy has taken full grasp of society. So fuck it, who cares if facebook sells your info to giant corporations, atleast we're still not shopping at Walmart anymore, are we?
Oh wait, Walmart and Facebook both share a board member (or former board member), Jim Breyer?
I found this comment on a discussion of Google vs Facebook, and their battle over the future of the Internet: "Zuckerberg may be the cute face to front Facebook, but we all know
that the (only) two other board member's Peter Theil and Jim Breyer are
humanists of the highest degree.
Yes! because Thiel's extreme
vision of capitalism where corporations control the whole world is
'humanizing'. TheVanguard.Org and 'The Diversity Myth' are humanist
projects, not neoconservative? Support for the rich using offshore tax
havens...that's the ethical human thing to do!
Jim Breyer's time on the board of Walmart, why, I'm sure he's helping Walmart become more caring, personal, and humane.
Greylock Venture Capital's ties to the CIA are also of no concern, I'm sure.
Can
you make money out of friendship? Can you create communities free of
national boundaries - and then sell Coca-Cola to them? Facebook is
profoundly uncreative. It makes nothing at all. It simply mediates in
relationships that were happening anyway.
I think It's pretty insane that people present their personal details in public via social networking."
It concerns me, that out of the many intelligent, strong, and progressive individuals I know, most are on facebook. Infact, its even more disconcerting, that the activist scene seems to have migrated its organizing to facebook groups (perhaps not exclusively, but still, come on!).
I guess I'm not surprised. I've seen very similar attitudes (read: apathy), when I look at mailing lists such as the LAN, or whatnot, and see the large number of hotmail accounts. Or sit in a fair trade coffee shop and play "count the macbook".
But I digress. I'm just tired of technology being seen as insignificant when it comes to world changing issues. When in reality, its technology that is changing the world, just not in the ways it should be. More people are buying into Apple's Reality Distortion Field everyday, I guess Facebook has developed its own. (I don't want to get into why Apple is such a large hinderance progressive change, maybe buy me a few double rums and I'll loudly explain)
I guess I'm just sick of it all.. With all the talk of online privacy, Net Neutrality, and copyright violations in the media, I'm shocked at how low priority this has been. On a possitive note, it seems as though Canada is steering away from our own version of the DMCA. Yet its still not nearly enough.
- Trev M's blog
- Login or register to post comments





the revolution won't be on facebook
'nuff said!
Can't use the master's tool's to dismantle his house.
Where is the demand for PUBLIC social networking sites? Why aren't activists who are 'serious' about change leading this demand instead of pretending they are going to organize accepted change through facebook?
Public radio and TV were demands of activists back in the day...do activists today not understand the implications or are they just lazy? I don't know but it frightens me too.
Great commentary!
groups
I wonder if there's a "boycott facebook" facebook group?
Unlike the former media technology, the Internet and related technologies are in a unique position to enable "freedom". Television and radio weren't nearly as accessible to being interactive.
These days we don't even really need to demand any public sites, its just a matter of DIY. Take this site for instance, its a public site, it was made with the intent of being open. Though when developers for the commons added social networking tools to it, some members of the community screamed.. those same members I believe had at the time, or went on to create facebook accounts.
the new londonfuse site is a strange thing as well. seems to be aimed at progressive artists, but to utilitze the big mainstream sites like facebook and twitter. This makes sense logistically, in that it events and shit can get promoted to a mass audience. Its public in a sense that everything its open to anyone to see (logged in or not), but it not open, and I don't know how I feel about it yet.
I'd like to see public sites, with proper privacy settings, proper community oversight, and trustworthy members of the community in a position to steer them. we can dream, but at the end of the day, would they actually be used? Big business has a way of coming up with the latest and greatest to offer, where public, or open alternatives are left in the dust (I can name a few projects, the biggest being GNU/Linux).
People's ethics slide when it comes to computers. Won't buy certain shoes because they pollute too much or use slave workers, only buy organic food because its safer, but we'll use software and technology from 2 of the worst corporations in computer technology. I'm talkin about Microsoft AND Apple. But suggest any opensource, its dismissed using the same decade old rhetoric from the pc vs mac ads.
Marketting firms work, especially with technology at the level it is now. so I think its mostly coming down to apathy mixed with a touch of brainwash, in a broth of laziness..its disappointing.
LFP - Facebook violates privacy law: watchdog
OTTAWA — Canada’s privacy watchdog says Internet phenomenon Facebook breaches the law by keeping users’ personal information indefinitely — even after members close their accounts.
Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart says the popular social networking site should hang on to the data only for as long as truly necessary.
In a report Thursday, Stoddart urged Facebook to remedy the problem, one of several serious privacy shortfalls she discovered.
read more:
http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/CanadaWorld/2009/07/16/10155981.html
time is up
Facebook has run out of time to adjust its privacy policies in accordance with Canadian Privacy laws (as mentioned in the previous comment).
the article gives more detail. It'll be interesting to see what comes of this. Will facebook change (I find it hard to believe that will happen to the degree the law would hope), or will the laws suddenly be less enforced?
Time will tell.
The article mentions that a big issue isn't with facebook itself, but rather the add-on 'apps' people subscribe to. To use the features the apps offer above facebook default, the subscriber must give consent to the developer of said app, all info of the user despite what privacy settings are in place. Well, all except contact info, states the article. However, its facebook's software that allows this to happen.
Now why does a simple quiz test, or hot babe of the day app need to know all my details? well simply put, to sell this info for marketing research and well, who knows what else. Developers can be anyone, and its really up to the user to acknowledge the risk before deciding if its worth it for a stupid scrabble clone. Caveat emptor really comes into play, but as the article points out, the info just isn't there, and when it is, users either can't find it, its incomplete, or its just too difficult to sift through. Given the droves of idiots flocking to facebook, there needs to be more safeguards.
Facebook is just an evolved version of the old Nigerean email scam, any facebook users care to give me their bank info, I have some money I need to transfer, you'll get a nice cut?? Perhaps you'd be interested in some nice ocean front property in beautiful saskatoon?
**EULA** by reading any of the above, or even clicking on this comment without reading the above entitles the author to a usage fee based entirely on well whatever.. fuck you facebook.
Creeps
Facebook gives me creeps... but, it is incredibly useful